Labour-run Westminster City Council has formally opposed Government proposals to restrict the role of elected Councillors in the planning process, warning that the changes would reduce democratic oversight and damage public trust in planning decisions.
The proposals, currently under consultation, would introduce a new “two-tier” system. Under this, most minor and medium-sized planning applications, including schemes of up to 50 homes, would no longer be eligible for consideration by planning committees. Instead, decisions would be delegated entirely to council officers, removing the opportunity for elected councillors and members of the public to participate directly in the process via a committee hearing.
In its response, Westminster Council argues that:
- Committee oversight adds value, not delay: In Westminster, fewer than 2% of applications are referred to a committee, and when they are, the additional time taken is typically just two to three weeks.
- Democratic input improves outcomes: Nearly 10% of applications that go to Westminster’s planning committee are decided differently from the recommendation made by officers, demonstrating that committees play a meaningful role.
- Removing committee review would erode confidence: In a dense, urban environment like Westminster, even small schemes can have significant local impact. Removing Councillor oversight could alienate residents and undermine the legitimacy of the planning system.
The Council proposes an alternative approach where authorities with strong performance records would retain discretion over which applications are considered by committee. It also warns that the new system could unintentionally encourage more appeals, leading to higher costs and further delays.
Councillor Geoffrey Barraclough, Cabinet Member for Planning and Economic Development, said:
“The right to be heard is essential to good planning. Planning decisions shape the future of our city, street by street. That’s why it’s essential that local people and their elected representatives continue to have a voice. In Westminster, we’ve shown that democratic oversight improves both the quality and the fairness of the planning process. We’re calling on the Government to think again before weakening local accountability.”